ABSTRACT
Purpose@#This study aimed to apply doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticle microbubble (Dox-NP-MB) therapy in an orthotopic rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and investigate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-DWI) for response evaluation. @*Methods@#Twenty-eight N1S1 HCC model rats were treated with either Dox-NP-MB (group [G] 1, n=8), doxorubicin (Dox) alone (G2, n=7), nanoparticle microbubbles alone (G3, n=7), or saline (G4, control, n=6) on days 0 and 7, and were sacrificed on day 11. IVIM-DWI and CEUS were performed before each treatment and before euthanasia. Efficacy was estimated by the percentage of tumor volume growth inhibition compared with control. Toxicity was assessed by body weight changes and blood tests. Post-treatment changes in IVIM-DWI and CEUS parameters were analyzed. @*Results@#Tumor volume growth was inhibited by 48.4% and 90.2% in G1 and G2 compared to G4, respectively. Compared to G2, G1 had a significantly lower degree of body weight change (median, 91.0% [interquartile range, 88.5%-97.0%] vs. 88.0% [82.5%-88.8%], P<0.05) and leukopenia (1.75×103 cells/μL [1.53-2.77] vs. 1.20×103 cells/μL [0.89-1.51], P<0.05). After the first treatment, an increase in peak enhancement, wash-in rate, and wash-in perfusion index on CEUS was observed in G3 and G4 but suppressed in G1 and G2; the apparent diffusion coefficients, true diffusion coefficients, and perfusion fractions significantly increased in G1 and G2 compared to baseline (P<0.05). @*Conclusion@#Dox-NP-MB showed reduced Dox toxicity. Early changes in some CEUS and IVIM-DWI parameters correlated with the therapeutic response.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the performance of the 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) Practice Guidelines (hereafter, PG) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, compared to the Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 (hereafter, v2018). @*Materials and Methods@#From January 2013 to October 2015, treatment-naïve hepatic lesions (≥ 1 cm) on gadoxetic acidenhanced MRI in consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis were retrospectively evaluated. For each lesion, three radiologists independently analyzed the imaging features and classified the lesions into categories according to the 2018 KLCA-NCC PG and LI-RADS v2018. The imaging features and categories were determined by consensus. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to compare the per-lesion diagnostic performance of the 2018 KLCA-NCC PG and LI-RADS v2018 using the consensus data. @*Results@#In total, 422 lesions (234 HCCs, 45 non-HCC malignancies, and 143 benign lesions) from 387 patients (79% male; mean age, 59 years) were included. In all lesions, the definite HCC (2018 KLCA-NCC PG) had a higher sensitivity and lower specificity than LR-5 (LI-RADS v2018) (87.2% [204/234] vs. 80.8% [189/234], p < 0.001; 86.2% [162/188] vs. 91.0% [171/188], p = 0.002). However, in lesions of size ≥ 2 cm, the definite HCC had a higher sensitivity than the LR-5 (86.8% [164/189] vs. 82.0 (155/189), p = 0.002) without a reduction in the specificity (80.0% [48/60] vs. 83.3% [50/60], p = 0.15).In all lesions, the sensitivity and specificity of the definite/probable HCC (2018 KLCA-NCC PG) and LR-5/4 did not differ significantly (89.7% [210/234] vs. 91.5% [214/234], p = 0.204; 83.5% [157/188] vs. 79.3% [149/188], p = 0.071). @*Conclusion@#For the diagnosis of HCC of size ≥ 2 cm, the definite HCC (2018 KLCA-NCC PG) had a higher sensitivity than LR-5, without a reduction in specificity. The definite/probable HCC (2018 KLCA-NCC PG) had a similar sensitivity and specificity to that those of the LR-5/4.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the performance of the 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) Practice Guidelines (hereafter, PG) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, compared to the Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 (hereafter, v2018). @*Materials and Methods@#From January 2013 to October 2015, treatment-naïve hepatic lesions (≥ 1 cm) on gadoxetic acidenhanced MRI in consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis were retrospectively evaluated. For each lesion, three radiologists independently analyzed the imaging features and classified the lesions into categories according to the 2018 KLCA-NCC PG and LI-RADS v2018. The imaging features and categories were determined by consensus. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to compare the per-lesion diagnostic performance of the 2018 KLCA-NCC PG and LI-RADS v2018 using the consensus data. @*Results@#In total, 422 lesions (234 HCCs, 45 non-HCC malignancies, and 143 benign lesions) from 387 patients (79% male; mean age, 59 years) were included. In all lesions, the definite HCC (2018 KLCA-NCC PG) had a higher sensitivity and lower specificity than LR-5 (LI-RADS v2018) (87.2% [204/234] vs. 80.8% [189/234], p < 0.001; 86.2% [162/188] vs. 91.0% [171/188], p = 0.002). However, in lesions of size ≥ 2 cm, the definite HCC had a higher sensitivity than the LR-5 (86.8% [164/189] vs. 82.0 (155/189), p = 0.002) without a reduction in the specificity (80.0% [48/60] vs. 83.3% [50/60], p = 0.15).In all lesions, the sensitivity and specificity of the definite/probable HCC (2018 KLCA-NCC PG) and LR-5/4 did not differ significantly (89.7% [210/234] vs. 91.5% [214/234], p = 0.204; 83.5% [157/188] vs. 79.3% [149/188], p = 0.071). @*Conclusion@#For the diagnosis of HCC of size ≥ 2 cm, the definite HCC (2018 KLCA-NCC PG) had a higher sensitivity than LR-5, without a reduction in specificity. The definite/probable HCC (2018 KLCA-NCC PG) had a similar sensitivity and specificity to that those of the LR-5/4.
ABSTRACT
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a powerful technique for differentiating focal liver lesions (FLLs) without the risks of potential nephrotoxicity or ionizing radiation. In the diagnostic algorithm for FLLs on CEUS, washout is an important feature, as its presence is highly suggestive of malignancy and its characteristics are useful in distinguishing hepatocellular from non-hepatocellular malignancies. Interpreting washout on CEUS requires an understanding that microbubble contrast agents are strictly intravascular, unlike computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. This review explains the definition and types of washout on CEUS in accordance with the 2017 version of the CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System and presents their applications to differential diagnosis with illustrative examples. Additionally, we propose potential mechanisms of rapid washout and describe the washout phenomenon in benign entities.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Contrast Media , Diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Information Systems , Liver , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Microbubbles , Neoplasm Metastasis , Radiation, Ionizing , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of T₂* mapping using 3D multi-echo Dixon gradient echo acquisition on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool to evaluate hepatic function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the IRB and the requirement of informed consent was waived. 242 patients who underwent liver MRIs, including 3D multi-echo Dixon fast gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence at 3T, before and after administration of gadoxetic acid, were included. Based on clinico-laboratory manifestation, the patients were classified as having normal liver function (NLF, n = 50), mild liver damage (MLD, n = 143), or severe liver damage (SLD, n = 30). The 3D multi-echo Dixon GRE sequence was obtained before, and 10 minutes after, gadoxetic acid administration. Pre- and post-contrast T₂* values, as well as T₂* reduction rates, were measured from T₂* maps, and compared among the three groups. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in T₂* reduction rates between the NLF and SLD groups (−0.2 ± 4.9% vs. 5.0 ± 6.9%, p = 0.002), and between the MLD and SLD groups (3.2 ± 6.0% vs. 5.0 ± 6.9%, p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in both the pre- and post-contrast T₂* values among different liver function groups (p = 0.735 and 0.131, respectively). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve for using T₂* reduction rates to differentiate the SLD group from the NLF group was 0.74 (95% confidence interval: 0.63–0.83). CONCLUSION: Incorporation of T₂* mapping using 3D multi-echo Dixon GRE sequence in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI protocol may provide supplemental information for liver function deterioration in patients with SLD.